One of the worst companies - Senior Product Manager Inovalon Employee Review

1.0
Dec 19, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People are nice. You can get promoted very quickly due to the high attrition and lack of available talent nearby. Not sure if that is a nice thing. Basically incompetent people get promoted to fill a void.

Cons

Top heavy management who scramble at the beck and call of a CEO who has no sense of direction. Even the C-levels have difficulty sticking around. I have seen the COO acting both as COO, CFO and CPO. You know something is not right when they leverage one man to do the jobs of three. Instead of investing in talent and developing great products, they invest in trying to make mediocre products look world class (not everything is "leading" and "state of the art"!) They have no clue how to grow. IMO, they have reached a plateau after growing very rapidly in the start. Hardly any new innovation. Unfortunately this takes a toll on hourly or full time employees as the company goes through an annual lay-off (almost like a ritual). Product managers have no real sense of product management. Then again, it is hard to recruit talent if compensation is so abysmal. They have come with a fancy slogan of INSPIRE standing for (Integrity, Nimble...). They fail on all of them. In two years of going public they got into trouble with the SEC and faced lawsuits (not sure if it was intentional or purely incompetence). I can go on and on. There are two many. It is hard to believe they have survived for so long. I guess they must be riding the momentum of early growth or doing something right.

Explore other reviews about Inovalon

5.0
Jun 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hybrid, great commission and salaries

Cons

Best place Ive ever worked

1.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company was a great place to work under the leadership of its founder and CEO. It offered strong products, a positive culture, and exceptional sales leadership. However, after the founder and president departed, the company’s direction and leadership changed significantly, impacting the overall employee experience.

Cons

Since the leadership transition, the focus appears to have shifted away from employees and more toward financial performance and investor perception. The company has gone through multiple rounds of layoffs, while at the same time hiring sales representatives who often seemed underprepared for the role. Much of the enablement function was reduced or eliminated, with an increasing reliance on AI-driven solutions. Leadership within my department was challenging (toxic). There was a noticeable tendency to favor individuals brought in from a previous company, which negatively impacted morale and team dynamics - leadership was clueless . The leadership style often came across as inflexible, with limited openness to alternative perspectives or collaboration. It was a “I know best because I’m so experienced so it should be THIS way” mentality . As a result, cross-functional relationships suffered (sales leaders didn’t respect dept leadership) and there was little partnership with sales leadership to reinforce training and enablement initiatives. One bright spot was the Sales Engineering organization. The team was highly skilled, well-respected, and led by an exceptional leader who fostered a strong culture and delivered real value to the business. Overall, while the company offers solid products and has talented people in certain areas, the culture, leadership decisions, and ongoing organizational instability make it difficult for me to recommend as a long-term career destination.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All