Incompetent Leadership . No work-life balance - Senior BizOps Engineer Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
Jun 25, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Lots of leaves compared to other companies. (whether you can avail it depends on your manager and work load) 2. New Office in Pune with state of the art facilities 3. Niche domain

Cons

1. No work life balance 2. Flexi hours resulting in employees working more than 12 hours per day and even on weekends as scrum calls and meetings usually happen late evenings IST. 3. Incompetent leadership. Favoritism and boot-licking culture encouraged. Promotions and increments are based on this. 4. No formal on-boarding and knowledge sharing. You learn as you work resulting in long learning curve and people dependency 5. Most of the decision making done Onsite. 6. Too much micro-management. 7. Lay-offs happening since last 2 to 3 years. 8. Single digit increments with no career growth ( The boot lickers get 30 to 50 % hike though with promotions)

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
May 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Cons

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All