Avoid Capex finance team - Project Accountant National Grid Employee Review

1.0
Jun 26, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Engaging Work: The projects are diverse and required collaboration with various business units, which is stimulating and educational. Learning Opportunities: The role offers substantial chances to expand industry knowledge and develop professionally

Cons

Toxic Management Culture: The management team in the CAPEX department fosters a toxic environment. Senior managers tend o micromanage, significantly limiting autonomy and creativity. Favoritism: There is a noticeable "favorites" club within the team. Certain individuals received preferential treatment based on subjective criteria rather than merit. Bias and Harassment: Senior managers often harass employees who challenged the status quo, creating an environment of fear rather than innovation. Workload Disparities: Favored employees received additional support and had their responsibilities adjusted, while others flagged excessive workloads and received no assistance. Unethical Interview Practices: The interview process was ethically questionable, with a candidates participating in interview panels for a role they had applied for and was placed in role after interview process concluded. This resulted in biased hiring decisions. Lack of Leadership Accountability: Senior leadership was aware of the toxic management practices but failed to take corrective action, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and turnover. Overall Experience: The CAPEX team at National Grid is a demotivating and toxic work environment. Management practices hindered professional growth and negatively impacted morale.

avatar
National Grid Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback.There are several routes other than your direct line manager to report concerns to, including: your ethics champions, other senior leadership, our HR People team or our ethics teams. We strongly enough that if you have observed or heard any breach of policy, or what involves unethical conduct, or it just doesn't feel right, to raise these concerns. Our ethics team have set up both internal and external contact avenues to support the raising of concerns. We'd rather you report a situation than let possible unethical behaviour go unchecked.

Explore other reviews about National Grid

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At NGED the few pros are lessened by the day as the cons are increasing. The idea of a career has gone and now most are resigned to just having a job.

Cons

Aside from the reality being very different from what the leadership team sell IE they don't care about people or net zero, it's all spin and marketing. Now at NGED we are in a situation where staff you have known for many years simply disappear from duty and no one seems to know why, a couple of weeks later they have left the business with an NDA. It's happening all over the business. There seems to be a drive to remove any leaders who have industry technical knowledge and replace them with people from outside the industry who knows little to nothing about electricity. Despite safe to say being an important value, speaking out against this usually results in an NDA. It's toxic positivity where playing along seems to be more important than the role you fulfil.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All