A great place to grow if you fit into this mold. - Anonymous employee OTIS Employee Review

3.0
Mar 26, 2009
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At the time Otis offered a full tuition reimbursement program for continuing education. Their pay was at the top end for the elevator industry. Corporate wide there was a strong emphasis on safety. Most of the management was fair in evaluating performance and determining compensation.

Cons

In the early 2000 years, there were some difficult junior managers to work with. You were either in the know, or you were not. Lots of things appeared to be done without the most rigorous accounting. As long as sales were high, anything goes. When times were tighter, the flaws began to reveal themselves.

Explore other reviews about OTIS

5.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Real team work oriented. Feels very much being part of the company

Cons

Needs juggling multiple jobs! A lot of travel involved. But great learning opportunities follow these.

1
1.0
Jun 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Otis is a well-known company with a strong brand name, established customers, and exposure to major commercial accounts. The role gives you real responsibility quickly, especially if you are managing a service territory with active customer issues, contract renewals, and operational escalations. The experience can build strong skills in account management, customer retention, field coordination, problem solving, and handling high-pressure customer situations. You get direct exposure to customers, technicians, operations, and leadership, which can be valuable if you want to grow in service, sales, or facilities-related industries

Cons

The biggest issue is poor management. The branch has serious operational problems, but leadership does not seem to have a clear plan to fix them. Instead, the pressure gets pushed down to the account manager, who ends up dealing with angry customers, unresolved service issues, delayed communication, and internal problems they do not fully control. Management needs to take more ownership of the environment they are putting employees into. New hires should not be expected to clean up long-standing territory issues without proper training, realistic timelines, and real support. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and blaming them for problems that were already there. The leadership style feels reactive instead of organized. Problems are addressed after they become urgent, communication is inconsistent, and expectations can feel disconnected from what is actually happening in the field. This creates unnecessary pressure on employees and makes it harder to rebuild trust with customers. The role would be much more manageable if management provided stronger onboarding, clearer priorities, better internal coordination, and more realistic expectations. Without that, employees can end up stuck between frustrated customers and a leadership team that does not provide enough support to actually solve the root issues.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All