Dismissive Leadership, Homogenous Culture -- Think Twice - Talent Acquisition OpenGov Employee Review

1.0
Feb 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The two people on my direct team (my manager as well as my role counterpart) were awesome people; respites from the truly toxic culture at OpenGov.

Cons

As someone who recently left Opengov after a mere 9 months (a trend that is sadly becoming all too common at OpenGov due to leadership's inability to retain employees for more than a year), I feel a responsibility to share my experience. My time there was marred by serious cultural and structural issues, which should give any potential employee pause before signing on. It's crucial to consider all the information before committing yourself to OpenGov's tumultuous working environment. Workplace Culture and Inclusion - As a person of color, I felt marginalized and isolated in the overwhelmingly homogeneous office environment. In one instance, after raising concerns about feeling disconnected from the team, I was relocated to a secluded area of the office with the only other person of color on my team, only to be moved back to a visible place in the office when a manager raised concerns about the optics to leadership. - There's a concerning lack of diversity at Opengov, with 70% of employees being white and 61% being male according to data accessible via Glassdoor (though I suspect the true numbers are even more imbalanced). Even more concerning is the fact that there seems to be no recognition or effort to address this issue. When I asked about DEI initiatives during my interview, the CHRO bluntly stated that none existed. This is unacceptable and needs to be addressed immediately for the sake of creating an inclusive and diverse workplace for all employees. Management Practices - It was disheartening to experience a pattern of blatant hypocrisy from upper management. Leadership pushes for a strict return to office policy, but many of them are conveniently located away from San Francisco or other main offices, instead working remotely. Leadership’s lack of consideration and disregard for the well-being of employees (while prioritizing their own) speaks volumes about the company's actual values and priorities. - I experienced three manager changes in nine months, causing major disruptions and highlighting a lack of stability within the organization. This disarray was not isolated, and was negatively impactful to employee morale - There was a concerning instance when one of my teammates, who was working hard as an individual contributor, was suddenly thrust into a managerial role without any prior communication or input. They were blindsided and had to learn about their new responsibilities during a team meeting, at the same time as everyone else. This lack of consideration and disregard for their professional development was unacceptable from my perspective, but Opengov from my experience was never a workplace that prided itself on collaboration and mutual support. It was disheartening to see such careless actions from management, and greatly impacted team morale - Leadership's response to employee concerns was often openly dismissive. In a team meeting, I observed leadership explicitly dismiss negative criticism around Glassdoor reviews, stating that "if people leave [voluntarily] they're probably not the A-players … it's probably not regrettable", blatantly implying that negative feedback wasn't valid. Furthermore, we were often asked to write positive Glassdoor reviews, with leadership stating “if Glassdoor is a deterrent we should try to level the playing field” and noting that they “think many reviews are AI generated”. From these statement, it was pretty clear that leadership had no concern or respect for the employee perspective at Opengov. Professional Development and Support - I frequently expressed concerns about unprofessional and hostile behavior among certain individuals, but my concerns were often dismissed with phrases like "that's just their personality" or "you need to toughen up". Even my favorite people at the company would parrot these lines back to me, illustrating the fact that this tolerance of bad actors was a truly ingrained company value. It was disheartening to see a lack of accountability and unwillingness to address the root issues, which created a toxic work environment. I want to be clear: while this was my personal experience, these issues appeared systemic, ingrained within the company culture, rather than isolated incidents. We all deserve a supportive and nurturing work environment where our hard work is recognized and our potential for growth is nurtured. Opengov drastically falls short of providing that, and it breaks my heart to see such a lack of consideration for their employees' well-being and professional development.

Explore other reviews about OpenGov

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, fast paced environment with rewarding mission-driven work.

Cons

Need to continue to build operational rigor with certain vertical depts as we continue to grow.

1.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The startup-era culture here was genuinely good — collaborative, energetic, people-first. As the company grew, so did the ego. Leadership lost what made the place work and replaced it with a top-down, my-way culture that has driven out some of the best people.

Cons

I'm writing the review I wish had existed when I was researching this company. Not checking Glassdoor before I started was my single biggest professional regret. Promotion is positioned during recruiting as a near-term, achievable goal. In reality, the criteria are vague, inconsistently applied, and rarely result in actual advancement. KPIs are set at levels that ensure most reps will fall short — creating a perpetual sense of failure that serves management's pressure tactics, not your career growth. Advancement often appears less tied to clear performance metrics and more dependent on subjective favoritism, including maintaining close alignment with or “sucking up to” hiring managers and leadership, rather than merit alone. Transparency is essentially nonexistent. Turnover in the SDR org specifically is high and ongoing, but it’s never acknowledged or addressed internally. Candidates have no way of knowing the full picture going in. One more thing worth knowing: account executives are coached during training to post positive Glassdoor reviews. Please weigh that when you look at the overall rating. “Unlimited PTO” is also not as flexible as it may be presented. In practice, time off appears to be closely monitored and can be restricted, even for high performers, based on internal perceptions of fairness across the team rather than true flexibility or performance-based trust. This makes the benefit feel more like a recruiting talking point than an actual employee perk.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All