Malwarebytes Reviews

Pros

Great Company Internally, great people

Cons

Still Growing but im here for the ride

Pros

Product is great, leadership does a good job

Cons

None that I can think of

Pros

Compensation was average Online Training and onboarding are superior Workstation provided was high tier WFH High Potential

Cons

Hostile Management Employee Gate keeping No Trust or Faith in employees Lack of responsibility share Hostile and conspiring Co workers

Pros

I enjoyed my time working

Cons

Could have supported college graduates more

Pros

New technology to continuously grow one's technical skills Great team and culture No micro-management

Cons

Some teams are small, so you must wear more than one hat at a time.

Pros

-Unlimited PTO -Great work / life balance -Good Culture

Cons

None, I love working at Malwarebytes

Pros

Malwarebytes has great benefits. Unlimited PTO, solid pay, tons of holidays off, etc. The people are cool too and it's nice working for a company that protects vulnerable organizations from cyberattacks.

Cons

Crazy turnover and layoffs leave huge gaps in departments, leaving most people scrambling to put the pieces back together. Somewhat aimless product offerings, doesn't know what company it wants to be, etc.

Pros

Being remote helps offset expenses.

Cons

Lack of growth from what Ive seen

Pros

Great culture, products, and services

Cons

They are still developing their Channel (Indirect Sales) and strategies.

Pros

Back in the day it had some of the sharpest, most creative, empathetic people in the industry. A lot of the consumer product on both mac and win was built by a very small number of people who truly cared about being the best out there. They're gone now, pushed out by senior leadership with limited technical skills and smaller vision.

Cons

woof, where to start? Marcin has negligible business acumen and a habit of trusting the wrong people based on social connection rather than a proven track record of achievement. Yes men were gradually brought in over the years and as the quality of the enterprise product declined, it became difficult to attract senior leaders with any sort of meaningful experience or technical skills. That vacuum in strategic leadership trickled downwards to where middle managers were forced to fend for themselves and guess at what might please the VPs in any given quarter, and what the next "strategy pivot" would be. Frequently, the next new thing would be a goal previously tried and failed years ago. If you don't get on one of the few teams where the lead is liked by the VP, good luck. Most of the female talent left already, usually for very good reason.