MangoApps reviews

1.8

18% would recommend to a friend

(123 total reviews)

Anup Kejriwal

18% approve of CEO

18% positive business outlook

MangoApps has an employee rating of 1.8 out of 5 stars, based on 123 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The MangoApps employee rating is 53% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

123 reviews
1.0
Jun 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you butter up the VP/Manager, you can enjoy unlimited work-from-home days.

Cons

The unprofessional management does nothing but micromanage. Only a few people have the privilege of working from home as often as they like — those who are close to the VP/Manager can do it for months or even years. But a normal employee who just wants to get their work done can't get approval, and that's when HR suddenly brings up "the process." Why doesn't this process apply to everyone? Either allow it for all, or stop work-from-home for all. People are leaving this toxic environment. The only ones who stay are those who have no other option, or those who lack the skills to move elsewhere.

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At this stage, I personally did not find any significant positives that outweigh the management, culture, and employee treatment issues experienced over the years.

Cons

After spending more than 8 years in this organization as a Software Developer, I can confidently say that the company culture has become increasingly political, biased, and mentally exhausting over time. The biggest concern is job security. Employees constantly work under fear due to sudden layoffs and unpredictable management decisions. Long-term contribution and loyalty do not seem to matter, as employees can easily be replaced regardless of performance or dedication. The overall work environment is heavily influenced by favoritism rather than merit. Employees who are close to senior management receive flexibility, visibility, and growth opportunities, while others are expected to work under constant pressure with little recognition. Salary growth is below market standards, and appraisals are frequently delayed. Even high-performing employees struggle to receive fair compensation. The appraisal process lacks transparency and often feels designed to justify minimal salary hikes rather than reward genuine contributions. Leave approvals are unnecessarily difficult. Even for valid personal reasons, employees face excessive questioning and approval delays. Work-life balance is poor, and selective employees are exempt from responsibilities while others are expected to remain available during production issues and off-hours. Another frustrating aspect is the unhealthy communication culture. Employees often feel uncomfortable openly interacting with colleagues or maintaining friendships at work because of internal politics and management interference. The engineering culture is also deteriorating. Development timelines are unrealistic, planning is weak, and features are rushed without proper QA or technical design consideration. Management focuses more on feature quantity and presentation rather than product quality, scalability, or long-term technical stability. CEO: The CEO has strong business vision and ambitious goals, but priorities and directions change too frequently. Decision-making often feels inconsistent, creating confusion across teams and making long-term planning difficult for employees. CTO: The CTO lacks strong technical leadership and innovation focus. Instead of driving engineering excellence, architecture improvements, or technical strategy, the role feels heavily centered around task assignment and operational tracking. There is also a noticeable ego-driven management style that impacts collaboration and team morale. VPs / Directors: VP and Director level management show visible favoritism and biased behavior. Opportunities, flexibility, recognition, and support are often limited to selected employees, while others are constantly pressured and monitored. Employees who are not part of the preferred circle frequently feel sidelined, undervalued, and placed in a “red zone” regardless of their actual performance or contribution.

1.0
May 15, 2026

Management favoritism

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Secure Retirement for Old Employees just needs to handle mood swings of VP and Upper Management.

Cons

Huge difference between manager level. Those who are close to VP enjoy a lot, others have to work hard. Few managers can work from home as many days as they want, but if we do 1-2 days work from home, they behave like we are asking for leave. Few members don’t need to come on production issues, only selected few have to join calls anytime. Specially women manager/director/VP can come late to office, leave early, and can do any number of work from home.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 123 Reviews

Glassdoor has 126 MangoApps reviews submitted anonymously by MangoApps employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if MangoApps is right for you.