Vivid Racing reviews

At first glance, Vivid Racing appears to be a promising place to work, boasting a range of services and a seemingly dynamic team. However, upon closer inspection, the organization reveals a series of systemic issues that significantly impact its work environment and overall performance. Toxic Culture: The company culture is far from inclusive or supportive. There's a palpable tension in the air, as employees often feel pitted against each other rather than working towards a common goal. This toxic atmosphere stifles creativity and collaboration, making it difficult for team members to fully invest themselves in their roles. Inefficient Operating Structure: The operational structure is cumbersome and inefficient, leading to delays in decision-making and project execution. This inefficiency not only affects the company's performance but also contributes to employee dissatisfaction and burnout. Poor Values: The company's values, or lack thereof, are not aligned with ethical or sustainable business practices. This misalignment creates a disconnect between the workforce and the organization, making it challenging to foster a sense of community or shared purpose. Lack of Employee Appreciation: Employee contributions are often overlooked, and there is a distinct lack of recognition or reward for hard work. This lack of appreciation leads to low morale and high turnover rates, further destabilizing the already fragile work environment. Inappropriate Workplace Behaviors: Instances of inappropriate behavior are not uncommon, ranging from microaggressions to more overt forms of harassment. Unfortunately, these issues are often swept under the rug, creating an unsafe environment for those who experience them. Combative Nature of Owners: The owners, who should ideally set the tone for a positive work environment, contribute to the existing problems. Their combative nature and unwillingness to listen to feedback create a top-down culture of hostility and resistance to change. Lack of Knowledge and Feedback Acceptance: Despite having a team of capable senior employees and leaders, the ownership seems resistant to leveraging this internal expertise. There's a noticeable lack of knowledge at the top, and what's more concerning is the unwillingness to accept constructive feedback, even when it comes from seasoned professionals within the company.

Upper management and owners, specifically Dan are awful to work with and for. They micromanage everything you attempt to do and rarely accept any real feedback. Disorganized and messy would be the best way to describe how this company is ran.