nference reviews

3.3

50% would recommend to a friend

(213 total reviews)

Murali Aravamudan

44% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

nference has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 213 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The nference employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

213 reviews
1.0
Dec 10, 2024

Sinking Ship

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are many weeks where you work around 5-10 hours doing easy and boring pandas work (chatGPT does it nowadays) and copy pasting results into gsheet. They give you a week to complete a task that takes literally 3 hours of focused work. No camera on zoom calls. Basically, travel where you want, no questions asked.

Cons

The pros listed above are actually cons when you realize they hurt your career more than you think so. It also affects the company's success which explains the reason why they are running towards bankruptcy and pretty much laid off every other US-based data scientist. Why? Labor is cheaper in India and one person over there can do the job of 3 US-based data scientists. No promotion over 4 years because the company was not performing at its expected capacity but they never tell you what are the expectations. There is literally no future as a data scientist, you are just dealing with big pharma companies telling you how to extract the data and what to look for. If they don't like the numbers you pull, they change the rules on how to extract the data and you just need to redo the whole analysis. This is the "science-first" company ladies and gentlemen.

2.0
Aug 4, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very intelligent colleagues with great backgrounds from academia - Impressive internal technology for leveraging EHR data - Access to full Mayo clinic data

Cons

- Systemic culture of fear, and bad behavior is allowed to persist and sometimes even rewarded - Lots of favoritism by leadership with no guidelines for how to be successful other than to impress the founders - No clear vision, strategy, or roadmap. Priorities change hourly and employees are informed of these changes via public slack messages from leadership (even on nights & weekends) expecting them to drop everything and build something new immediately with no understanding of how it points to the bigger picture - Individual contributors are not allowed to have their own ideas or opinions, everything comes from the top with a mandate to execute

1.0
Aug 7, 2024

Hitting rock bottom and then some

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Access to lots of patient data - Coworkers were friendly

Cons

I initially hesitated to write a review, but the recent influx of overly positive reviews on Glassdoor, coinciding with the company’s funding push, prompted me to share my experience. Here’s a candid assessment: Lack of Integrity and Responsibility: The company suffers from a severe lack of accountability. Major issues, such as persistent de-identification issues, are met with a blame game rather than constructive solutions. Despite being “in the works” for years, these critical problems remain unresolved, reflecting poorly on the company’s commitment to addressing core issues. Toxic Work Environment: The work environment is toxic and characterized by favoritism. Promotions and advancements are not based on merit but on how close one is to higher-ups. This leads to significant pay inequity and positions being filled by individuals who lack the necessary experience. The resulting lack of competence in key roles impacts the company’s overall effectiveness and morale. Consequently, those in key roles often view their positions as justified and see other employees as ungrateful or lazy, which undermines team morale and effectiveness. Fickle Priorities and Inadequate HR: Higher-ups frequently shift priorities without clear direction, leading to erratic decision-making and random layoffs that disrupt team stability. The HR department is inadequate, often failing to address employee concerns effectively and contributing to the overall sense of instability. This lack of coherent strategy and support from HR further exacerbates the already toxic work environment. Core Issues and Leadership Problems: The core issue is that while there are ample opportunities for improvement, the company’s leadership—especially the uncle and nephew co-founders—are more focused on maintaining their positions and making rash, uninformed decisions to improve short-term financial appearances. This approach prevents meaningful progress and suggests that the situation will not improve until at least one of the co-founders is removed. Additionally, over-promising LinkedIn posts and exaggerated claims about achievements create a misleading image that does not align with the reality experienced by employees. The lack of willingness to adapt and address underlying issues from the top down is a major roadblock to any real change.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 213 Reviews

Glassdoor has 241 nference reviews submitted anonymously by nference employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if nference is right for you.