I had an initial call with a recruiter, where I was asked one easy question about a skewed mean vs. median. I then had a 45-minute technical phone interview with a Data Scientist Manager. One very easy SQL question, followed by about 30 minutes of just product analytics questions. I thought it went really well - the conversation went smoothly, good energy, I gave detailed answers and have product knowledge and enthusiasm from using the products myself. I was really excited about it, but then I just heard I didn't get past this round. Not sure why, I emailed asking for any feedback, but haven't heard yet. Red flags: the video aspect of the BlueJeans app didn't work, so we couldn't see each other; interviewer came off as slightly snobby and arrogant and told me she didn't read past the first page of my resume (I have a two-page resume, - I know there is debate about that, and I've heard cases made for either one-page or two-page, but now I'm strongly considering condensing mine to one page), but I guess they can afford to be that way, as they are facebook... (eye roll). Every time I've spoken with a Facebook data scientist in recent years, either in interviews or informally, there is a "you're lucky to speak with me, I know I'm in a privileged position and I love holding that over your head" vibe... not at all a humble stance or a sense that everyone has things to offer, not *only* people who work at Facebook. It's confusing to have a *technical* phone screen and to answer all the *technical* parts reasonably and correctly, and ... not make it to the next round, at which time rejection can be anything from personality fit to company needs. Being rejected at a technical round after doing well on the technical aspect is... odd.