Signifyd Interview Questions

First stage talent team conversation: Very communicative, professional and personable talent team. They went over culture etc - which seems an extremely positive one. Second stage meeting with an engineering manager and QA: An enjoyable conceptual discussion around approach and experience. Invited to go into detail and ask questions. There seems to be really interesting things to work on. Third stage tech test. Which I fell foul of: Knowledge of general code definitions was a large part of this. So, it's wise to brush up on those. The practical aspect was a pair programming session. I felt the answers were very much pre-defined. Make sure to think about where the questions are leading, rather than applying experience etc.

The initial screening with their talent team seemed to go very well, and they had basically guaranteed moving on to the next round with the hiring manager. They said they would reach out within a few days, and I never heard back again after. I don't know if they expected for me to chase them, but if they said they would reach out, it is common courtesy to reach out, even if the answer is no.

The interview process started with the recruiter and I moved to the hiring manager. It was a fairly straightforward process, but I had an issue with the recruiter/HR - similar to all of the other ratings that I've read. I never heard back from her with any questions I emailed to her. I had to eventually follow up to confirm she received my email to which she did not respond, but started a fresh email. It took her a week and a half to tell me that they were going in a different direction - there was no respect of urgency or my eagerness to hear back.

I had a very similar experience to the reviewer who submitted their feedback on July 20th, unfortunately. I applied for the Senior CSM position and had the initial screening call with a recruiter. From there, I was notified that I was being moved ahead to speak with the hiring manager for my 2nd call. That was a few weeks ago, and after being ghosted with no response to any of my follow-up emails, I got a notification today that they would not be moving forward with me. Very disjointed process overall, which is unfortunate given the glowing reviews they get elsewhere.

The process took 2 months. I was contacted by a recruiter regarding the role, within a week HR contacted me with the information that the role has been filled. They have offered the role to somebody who has changed his/her mind. Then they came back and wanted to proceed to the interview with a hiring manager, then they announced that they hired internally, then they wanted to interview . Eventually the interview with a hiring manager took place - 30 min, very regimented, dry. She was looking for a specific person, negative about the company I work for and questioned specific skills not mentioned in the job description. After further analyses I have realised they might have been interviewing for a Senior Director or VP role

Recruiter reached out to have a 30 minute call to discuss my background. I followed up multiple times with the recruiter who didn't provide any feedback nor told me if I was moving forward in the interviewing process. I don't mind being rejected but ghosting candidates who are trying to find a job during a recession is a terrible interviewing experience and unprofessional.

Interview pdf stated it was only 5 steps, this dragged into well over 7 separate interviews. Make sure you are respectful of the candidate's time if you are going to extend out the steps only to get a denial based on interpretative questions on the last step.