Needs to train the middle mgmt...or sack them - Senior Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
Nov 6, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good Brand Image - Excellent training sessions to attend - Top class clientèle through out the world especially strong in Europe

Cons

- Middle mgmt is worst, they will never listen to the developers - Managers feel themselves like CEOs - Performance review is worst and many managers not even discuss with the developers and instead just put the default ratings. - Lack of career guidance from the managers and they are least bother about developer's career. What managers simply look is billing of developers...that's it - There is no forum for employees to raise their voice - Highly impossible to get into any project which is different from your geography - Worst thing is managers gives their developers on loan to other managers when the developer is on bench....so called slave system - Even if you find out a project for yourself during the bench manager will not allow you to transfer to that geography instead he will say only on loan and the other manager will not accept to take you on loan. Ultimately you may loose that opportunity also.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All