HealthCare Support Reviews

Cons

I thought the job was working with providers. For the client I worked for it was a phone call center job. On the phone all day. Some days back to back calls. You can’t hang up

Cons

Unfortunately, there are more cons than pros. For starters, the favoritism in the office is unbelievable. This environment is very much like feed the rich and neglect everyone else. The whole time I worked here, I felt like I was given the scraps after the top performing recruiters have worked these prio jobs to death. The commission structure is atrocious and there are too many variables that interfere with you getting paid. All your efforts don't matter unless you are making the company money. A lot of the clients that HCS is supporting are companies that have a bad reputations, do not have competitive pay, and have been rumored to not treat their employees well. Good luck hunting.

Cons

You will need to hustle in order to succeed.

Cons

New on the job, so none yet. Processes and systems seem set up to help you succeed. It can be a discouraging industry for new professionals but it's a numbers game and this job helps you set up your funnel from calls all the way down to pre-screens, interviews and submittals.

Cons

With new acquisitions the bottom line has been pushed at the expense of it's employees and further compensation or even fair compensation has been withheld.

Cons

Hard to fill job orders in current market

Cons

When comparing this to other staffing agencies, I honestly cannot think of any cons. It's the best you're going to get in my opinion.

Cons

there is a lot of micro managing

Cons

I feel compelled to share my deeply unsatisfactory experience with Healthcare Support. Unfortunately, my time with this company was marked by an appalling commission structure, an incredibly toxic work environment, and unrealistic expectations that left me feeling drained and undervalued. To begin, the commission structure at Healthcare Support was nothing short of exploitative. Despite promises of fair compensation, the reality was far from it. The structure was convoluted, making it nearly impossible to earn a reasonable income. It felt as if the company was more interested in lining their own pockets than ensuring the financial well-being of their employees. What made matters worse was the toxic work environment fostered by Healthcare Support. Instead of promoting a supportive and collaborative atmosphere, the culture was rife with negativity, favoritism, and a blatant disregard for professionalism. Management turned a blind eye to employees using stimulants and other substances, creating an unsafe and unproductive workplace. It was disheartening to witness such disregard for the well-being and health of employees. Adding insult to injury, Healthcare Support had unrealistic expectations that left employees feeling overwhelmed and set up for failure. The workload was unreasonably heavy, with unreasonable targets that seemed unattainable. Rather than providing the necessary resources and support, management simply piled on more responsibilities without considering the detrimental impact on work-life balance and mental well-being. Furthermore, the issue of favoritism within the company was painfully apparent. Certain employees received preferential treatment, while others were overlooked and undervalued. This created a divisive and demoralizing atmosphere, eroding trust and fostering a sense of inequality among the team. In conclusion, I strongly advise against seeking employment with Healthcare Support. Their poor commission structure, toxic work environment, and unrealistic expectations are clear indications of a company that fails to prioritize the well-being and success of its employees. The allowance of substance abuse and the prevalence of favoritism only further highlight the deeply flawed and unethical practices within the organization. Spare yourself the distress and disappointment by pursuing opportunities with companies that value their employees and foster a positive, fair, and professional work environment.

Cons

No full remote availability, tight commission structure could be redone