Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Latitude 36 as 66.7% positive with a difficulty rating score of 2 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for QA/CI intern and Taxonomist rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Technical Recruiter and Recruiter roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Latitude 36 takes an average of 23 days when considering 6 user submitted interviews across all job titles. To compare, the average duration of hiring at similar companies like BlackRock, Inc. is 14 days, Fabricated Software, Inc. is 2 days, and Apple Inc. is 21 days. Candidates applying for Recruiter had the quickest hiring process (on average 10 days), whereas Technical Recruiter roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 30 days).
PRETTY SIMPLE and had 3 interviews , forst wit ha recruiter call and later 2it hthe plant a manges and finally with the warehouse and production associate .
learned a lot of stuff while in the company
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
how wiill you apprach any probelms and technical warehouse related questions .
It took roughly two weeks for me to go through the whole process. It was only one technical interview. It seemed like a scam at first because I was called from California but it was not. I am glad
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Latitude 36 in Nov 2018
Interview
This was for a Taxonomist role in Menlo Park, CA that Latitude 36 was representing. A recruiter proactively reached out to me and was very persistent and confident that my experience closely fit the role and would like to represent me. Before fielding some basic information about the Latitude 36 company, its process, etc. the recruiter insisted that I sign a Right-to-Represent before he could answer any questions, even questions regarding Latitude 36. After much back and forth, I insisted that if i move forward that they only represent me with this one particular role. While preparing but before sending the right-to-represent, the recruiter vocally acknowledged that he already submitted me for the role. I find this to be very unprofessional and limited my ability to formally consent to who would represent me.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Do you believe you would be a good fit for the role?