Ugly Stepchild of NA - Anonymous employee Capgemini Employee Review

2.0
Aug 29, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Salary and promotions are decent - Hire smart people, for the most part - Opportunities to create your own career - Senior leadership is nice if you're on their good side - 10 sick days! 15 PTO!

Cons

- Company lost basically all of the workforce from 2015 by 2018 - All the golden children left - Company is loaded with little kids who don't know what they're doing - Telling employees to read things on the internet does not constitute training - HR is awful (one of the ladies way, way worse than the other). All of recruiting quit. - Inability to innovate (testing automation, Salesforce, AWS) - no wonder you aren't winning contracts - Proposal process is done by consultants and is a joke - no one knows what they're doing - Lack of ability to choose your own People Manager/advocate for your career - if you hate your People Manager, too bad - Lack of leadership training/favorites game - senior leadership is full of former Booz employees who isolate themselves - if you aren't in their club, too bad - Mclean location is awful for collaboration - need to be back in DC

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All