Internal Transfer from Capgemini Sweden to Germany first Impressions - Sales Head Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Oct 19, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Involved Leadership. -Structured yet open for improvements. -Open to hiring new and veteran talent. -Great Support during the hiring, VISA and onboarding phase. -Great Support from Managers and peers both internal teams and colleagues from other teams within Capgemini. -Great Project management even at Junior project management levels. -Open and clear communication. -Better Pay Scale -Work and improvements both technical and functional are appreciated openly and encouraged (your contributions are literally called out monthly be it a certification or RFP closure or an innovative solution pitched and approved by the client for implementation) -Technical and Functional Knowledge is valued

Cons

-3 weeks into the system, need more time to find one.

avatar
Capgemini Response
4y
Dear colleague, Thank you for taking the time to evaluate Capgemini as an employer. It is great to read that you highlight the positive experience during your onboarding phase and the team spirit at Capgemini. Team solidarity and the working atmosphere with colleagues are often mentioned as one of our strengths. Welcome aboard to Capgemini Germany. We wish you a great time and a lot of fun. Best regards Laura Zschirnt, Lead HR Marketing and Employer Branding

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All