Lost - Manager Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Mar 21, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PFB the Pros:- Big brand. Well known big clients Could get an onsite opportunity based on the project.

Cons

PFB the cons:- No clear path for new hires. Newly hired resources would feel lost. No reply to the questions or concerns. Multiple BGVs (Before and after joining) also take so long time and no connection with the project for a long time would affect productivity. Same documents would be asked multiple times which is not acceptable. After joining no project assignment, you need to drop multiple emails to get a response from the resource manager. The biggest shock is the joining location which is written in the offer letter is false they will give a totally different joining location after joining without any incentives. People(HR and management) are rude and not well behaved, that you feel from the start from the day of on-boarding. The POC which is mentioned in onboarding mail does not even reply or resolve any issues or concerns instead they will route you to the endless teams which tells you to contact your same POC. No clarity lots of hidden agenda. The moral of the story is there is no certainty so don't switch your well-settled jobs to this shady place.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All