Capgemini review - Full Stack Lead Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Oct 18, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only pro about this company is that they will pay you while they try to partner you up with a client. You should only apply here as a last resort.

Cons

This company doesn't care at all about their employees, I heard from numerous people that they just let you go without any remorse or compassion. A lot of the people that you will be dealing with are from offshore or got move to the us from offshore. And those people will ridicule you while they have zero to no knowledge on the subject. You really need a lot of patience dealing with this company, and always cover your work because someone will throw you into the fire even if the work wasn't even assign to you. Very toxic environment

avatar
Capgemini Response
1y
Thank you for your review. Your advice to management has been captured and will be shared with the appropriate teams. As a global company of over 340,000 people across 50 countries, we pride ourselves in our diversity and strive for an inclusive work environment. As a current employee, we strongly encourage you to also complete the monthly employee survey and share your feedback there as well. The survey is confidential and anonymous, and our teams are constantly reviewing employee feedback.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All