30 Day New Hire Review - Customer Service Specialist Kemper Employee Review

4.0
Aug 9, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The interview process was easy and everyone I've met are so friendly. I'm currently working in the Moosic Call Center and really feel at home here. The training is extensive and very through. I've never worked in a call center before so that was something I was really worried about going into it, but I feel confident that I will be able to service the Kemper customers.

Cons

Only downside I can think of is the few tech issues, they had with getting our credentials before we were hired. My group and myself didn't start until a month after our interview ( for me this wasn't a problem because of my previous job and I needed the extra time ), but this might be a serious concern for someone who needs a job right now.

avatar
Kemper Response
8y
Kemper is always open to learning of ways we can improve, so thank you for sharing your experience.

Explore other reviews about Kemper

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid work environment at Kemper

Cons

Pay is lower than what I would have liked

1.0
Jul 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote role, starting pay is $93k and the selection of benefits are great.

Cons

As an experienced major loss adjuster with decades in the industry, I found this to be one of the most heavily micromanaged claims environments I have worked in. In my experience, file management was closely monitored with significant emphasis on diary compliance, activity metrics, documentation, and "clicks," leaving little opportunity to focus on thoughtful claim handling. The expected inventory was communicated to be approximately 150 to 175 exposures, which I found difficult to reconcile with the level of investigation, litigation management, and customer service expected on complex claims. Despite hiring experienced adjusters, there was virtually no autonomy in managing files, and independent claim judgment was significantly limited by constant oversight and administrative metrics. Training did not adequately prepare new adjusters to navigate the company's proprietary software, numerous internal policies, and complex coverage determinations, including issues involving unlisted drivers, unlisted vehicles, and policy cancellations for non-payment of premium. I found the performance standards and metrics to be unrealistic given the workload and the level of training provided. Management communication was frequent and often disruptive. In my experience, there were regular interruptions throughout the workday by phone calls, Teams messages, emails, and redundant diary reminders, making it difficult to maintain focus on complex claims. Expectations regarding video calls were also inconsistent. I was initially told that my attire during unscheduled video calls was not a concern, but later instructed to dress professionally at all times because supervisors could initiate video calls without notice. Although the company emphasizes inclusion and employee support, my experience was that management's actions did not always align with those values. After raising concerns through HR regarding management, I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan shortly thereafter and ultimately my employment ended. That was my personal experience, and prospective employees should consider it when evaluating the company's culture. This position may be a good fit for individuals who are comfortable working in a highly structured, metrics-driven environment with constant management oversight. However, if you value professional judgment, autonomy, consistent expectations, and the ability to independently manage complex claims, my experience suggests this may not be the right environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All