Tenable Reviews | Glassdoor

Tenable Reviews

Updated February 12, 2019
239 reviews

Filter

Filter


3.5
StarStarStarStarStar
Rating TrendsRating Trends
Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
Tenable CEO Amit Yoran
Amit Yoran
101 Ratings

Employee Reviews

Sort: PopularRatingDate

Pros
  • "Work life balance is stellar - working remotely is a game changer" (in 19 reviews)

  • "The option to work from home is a big plus" (in 18 reviews)

Cons
  • "There can be some teething problems when a company is growing quite rapidly but this is true of any company" (in 16 reviews)

  • "I would call them growing pains" (in 13 reviews)

More Pros and Cons

  1. "It just gets better and better"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - CSM SE in Washington, DC
    Current Employee - CSM SE in Washington, DC
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I have been working at Tenable full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    This is an environment of recognition for great work. Work hard and do well. It's that simple. Ideas are listened to. Teams genuinely mix together rather than having closed doors or divisions. All the global offices make massive efforts to mix and get to know each other. Training is regular. Investment in employees is in place and valuable. Really I could go on for days how much this company has impacted and changed my life.

    Cons

    It's getting bigger and fast. It's hard to keep up to date with all the new faces but in saying that, it's not impossible. Really there isn't much I could complain about. We are in comfortable offices with great equipment and loads of benefits.

    Advice to Management

    Keep up the good work. Recognise and listen to your employees. When you stop doing that it's start to unfold but right now you are all over it.


  2. Helpful (1)

    "Good place many changes"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I worked at Tenable full-time (More than a year)

    Pros

    Great working environment, team and leadership

    Cons

    Pre-IPO reorganization, my job was reorganized and changed 6 times in two years.

  3. Helpful (1)

    "Reevaluate the effectiveness of the Inside sales team"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee in Columbia, MD
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee in Columbia, MD
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I have been working at Tenable full-time (More than 3 years)

    Pros

    Company overall is great with benefits, company morale, work-life activities, in-department lunches, fabulous over the top holiday party and for those in Sales- SKO is a bonus for getting away for 4 days.

    Cons

    Revamp the Inside sales team and review the strengths and weakness of each employee, I will with hold from calling out individual CTM members I work along with for another review.

    Advice to Management

    Sales will increase if you seriously review individual CTM's strengths and weaknesses. (NL&SH).


  4. Helpful (11)

    "New Product/Eng org is a nightmare"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Senior Product Manager in Seattle, WA
    Current Employee - Senior Product Manager in Seattle, WA
    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I have been working at Tenable full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Lots of resources, and they pay well for now. Remote friendly, even if most of the exec team is on the east coast.

    Cons

    The new re-org with the Product and Engineering is going terribly. They've taken away any and all agency that the Product Management team used to have, and replaced it with an engineering first organization. All without any real semblance of a plan.

    Example: Just had a massive re-org meeting that said to each team: "Here are your Q1 priorities". No business strategy, no context, no "why don't you bubble up what our priorities should be" -- just "here they are".

    Terrible communication across teams generally, but this new org structure takes the cake. Lack of clear ownership across products and decisions as well. It's unclear who's responsible for deciding what and when to ship -- is it Product Marketing? Product Management? Engineering? It may just be the CEO for every decision, as far as I know.

    Advice to Management

    If you don't get your stuff together ASAP you're going to lose every single person in the PM org.

    I'm giving the Product organization a month to get things together with new leadership before I start looking for another job.


  5. Helpful (2)

    "Excellent, fun, supportive"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    Pros

    Excellent treatment
    Excellent benefits
    Start-up culture despite being a publicly traded company

    Cons

    Constant change in workflow between departments


  6. Helpful (5)

    "Marketing Team"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

    I worked at Tenable full-time

    Pros

    Good company culture and they treat employees well.

    Cons

    Since the company is growing bigger things are changing too fast and sometimes changes are being made by Leadership without consideration of employees.


  7. Helpful (17)

    "Drama Queens"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Software Developer
    Former Employee - Software Developer
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

    I worked at Tenable full-time (More than a year)

    Pros

    Work from home, structured, defined

    Cons

    Too structured leaving no room for creativity, too many crybabies

    Advice to Management

    I was fired because I failed to participate in their rant meetings where they whine and complain like little Bs. Time to grow some. I never worked at a company where they complain about every tiny thing.

    They are so strict in their lints that I would waste hours just correcting them. Even stuff like variable names and and trailing spaces they would complain and seem very proud of that fact. They think they are curing cancer or performing brain surgery and so would take days just to approve a stupid PR that normally takes minutes.

    I was surprised that I was fired after helping out my manager numerous times with his tasks but he would not stand up for me. No backbone. Just a bunch of whiny Bs but even they have backbones.

    The application is beyond over engineered with too many pretentious developers who think they know better. They don’t.

    In the end, amidst the pretension and whining, I was actually glad they but me out of my misery.

  8. "State of the art"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    Former Employee - Software Development Engineer In Test
    Former Employee - Software Development Engineer In Test
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook

    I worked at Tenable full-time

    Pros

    Leveraged state of the art technologies with regards to test automation and Continuous Integration

    Cons

    pair programming sessions were difficult due to most engineers working remotely. Though that is a huge perk of the job :).


  9. Helpful (16)

    "It's a different company today than it was in the past. Evolving with both pros and cons"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I worked at Tenable full-time

    Pros

    The employees. Annual developer brainstorming/hacka-thon called INIT. Work from home flexibility. Good salary and benefits. Amit Yoran is very knowledgeable and is respected in the security industry .

    Cons

    Small, slow growing vulnerability scanning market, technology that is written in a proprietary software language that no other company uses (created by the founder), many key executives departed in 2017 (original CEO, CRO, CMO, CPO, CSO, CHO) withing 3 months of the new CEO arriving. Some of the new executives don't have the leadership skills of the prior execs.

    Advice to Management

    Tenable got to where it was through teamwork, and a leadership team that encouraged each other and employees to be the best they can be. All of those leaders are gone now expect for a couple of them. Unfortunately, some of the replacement executives have caused most of the negative reviews you see on Glassdoor. Great companies have three key things in common. Number 1 - great leadership from the bottom of the org to the top of the org that encourages and values employees. Number 2 - tremendous honesty about what is and isn't working and an ability to change quickly. Number 3 - alignment - everyone pulling together for the common good (not finger pointing).

    Tenable can be great, but there are headwinds blowing. The market is not big enough based on current Tenable offerings, and rebranding as the cyber exposure company to try to redefine it is a joke to those that know the market is really vulnerability management. Straddling the on premise and cloud/SaaS offerings is incredibly difficult. Keeping current on premises install based customers for Security Center in the fold, while more and more engineering gets put on to Tenable.io will make it very challenging. Finally, the SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation and Response) market could make vulnerability management market a commodity.


  10. Helpful (51)

    "Was once a unique company..."

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Columbia, MD
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Columbia, MD
    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I worked at Tenable full-time (More than 5 years)

    Pros

    Company culture allows managers, Directors, and VPs to pursue whatever goals they wish.
    The media image of this company is spotless. I learned that a successful company is one that is marketed and sold better than the competition.
    This company is currently in the right place at the right time. No meaningful competitors that can serve as a single source for similar functionality.
    When an issue gets raised by enough people, there is an effort to resolve it.
    There are many very smart people dotted throughout the organization.
    Casual business atmosphere.
    Knows how to get ranked as a best place to work, or any other comparison to gain attention.
    Interviewees have a good chance of being hired, as the company is growing.
    Despite challenges, always manages to climb to new heights.

    Cons

    Company culture allows managers, Directors, and VPs to pursue whatever goals they wish.
    This company doesn't fire employees, they fire departments. Ask them if they have a QA department this month.
    Documentation, compliance, procedures, and planning are non-existent across organizational boundaries. Could be a problem if they were ever acquired or attempted to IPO.
    Inter-department cooperation can be difficult.
    Project Management is non-existent.
    Strong opinions regarding vendors and technology along with constant power grabs make simple projects more complicated than they should be at a small company.
    After spending millions to onboard VPs, the same amount of work is being performed, with even less coordination.
    Witnessed a VP in a hockey jersey spitting sunflower seeds into a red solo cup while dressing down an employee. Classy place!
    Lack of a designated operations department means simple business processes are scattered across multiple entities. e.g. Shipping a package, corporate cell phone administration, remote office logistics, or even shuffling employee seating can be hilariously difficult.
    Frustrating lack of direction in some departments, leading to some back and forth on projects. Long term-strategy is missing. Do-overs are a waste of time.
    Customer Feedback regarding features and usability should be taken seriously. I've never understood why Customer Support doesn't riot.
    Products stubbornly cling to the concept of IPs for both functionality and licensing. Host-level functionality and licensing might make more sense.
    I believe Sales and QA were more effective 2 years ago. Both concern me.
    Any information pointing out a negative is publicly refuted, then quietly handled afterwards.
    Company suffers from extreme paranoia - this affects vendor selection, and calls employee loyalty into question needlessly.
    Company throws itself at unproven non-performers with well written resumes.
    Hiring is about quantity, not quality.
    Repackaging lesser products over and over isn't a strategy.
    It feels like turnover is increasing, with some notable members of staff beginning to vacate.
    Taught others; Learned very little.

    Advice to Management

    This review has been deleted 3 times. I re-post it every year. Negative comments about this organization are constantly being deleted.

    I worked at Tenable for more than 6 years. During that time we were wildly successful. I was able to bring my prior experience to the table and witnessed them move from a start-up to a mid-sized company. I felt that I was able to bring positive change to my corner of the organization. The work was fun and rewarding.

    Tenable is a darling of the security industry, and as such gets plenty of praise. I am opting to focus a bit more on the negative, in hopes that either current or future staff can keep the company on the right track. I was a technical employee, so most of my observations are from that viewpoint. In the end, anything I say is just an opinion, and could be refuted for the sake of appearances.

    If you are a self-starter, you'll do fine. Had the ability in my first few years to clean-up and create platforms and procedures as I saw fit. If I defined a plan, scope, and budget, I could get approval to accomplish anything to move the company ahead. Once a platform was agreed upon and rolled out, usage was compulsory. This is to be expected in any mature enterprise.

    The company has increasingly become a magnet for high maintenance employees with strong opinions and no boundaries. Don't like the standard issue equipment? Demand something else, you'll get it. Don't like an internal system? Stop using it and start using another one. This led to several competing and completely overlapping communications platforms, vendor relationships, procedures, and entire departments.

    Product Development decides which bugs to pursue, and they dictate how the product should be used. The QA department at times pushed back on software releases. The solution to this conflict was to dissolve QA and merge them along with Content into the Dev teams. This power grab was a great idea on paper, but the quality of software releases since that time was ... interesting. I believe QA has been disolved TWICE at this point.

    There is a staggering number of VPs associated with the development, marketing, and delivery of 4 products. There's 600 people in this company, not 6000. Original founders / VPs were fantastic, as they provided a unified vision and the direction to make things happen. Since they've started stepping back and hiring 'talented' management, the magic has begun to fade. Nobody knows what anybody else is doing until it's an emergency. Witnessed VPs simply defy corporate policies, create their own infrastructure, and hire contractors without corporate knowledge. When a VP on a conference call literally says "I don't know what my title or area of responsibility is" something isn't quite right.

    The problem becomes worse when you have multiple Marketing departments or multiple IT/Platforms/Cloud/Engineering departments providing quite a bit of overlap with no overall plan.

    Over the years it felt like the same 100 people still did all of the work, the only change being that we hired more people to either tell them how to do it or to get in the way.

    HR Department was too busy attempting to takeover Operations (Facilities, IT, anything else they can make a play for) to actually perform HR functions. They seem somewhat disorganized and disconnected from the rest of the organization. My team was asked for our job descriptions and resumes multiple times, I assume because they were lost. I've had other employees compensation information emailed to me by accident(!). Spreadsheets of employee compensation show up in shared spaces or on printers (the numbers I saw actually contributed to my voluntary departure). Review time was always needlessly confusing. From what I gather, some of the worst elements of HR have moved on.

    I'll stop here.

    This review is longer than any employee review or project plan that I saw over 6 years. The ratings rise and fall from time to time, but the rating trends on Glassdoor have dropped since June 2014 and I can't say that I disagree.