Engineer applicants have rated the interview process at Thermo Fisher Scientific with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 73% positive. To compare, the company-average is 56.2% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Engineer roles take an average of 21 days to get hired, when considering 11 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Thermo Fisher Scientific overall takes an average of 33 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Thermo Fisher Scientific as a Engineer according to 11 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 29%
One on one interview: 18%
Skills test: 14%
Group panel interview: 11%
Background check: 11%
Presentation: 7%
Drug test: 7%
Personality test: 4%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
Smooth and informal. Very friendly interaction. Interview was more of understanding my personality and character whether I’m fit for the role. Interviewer also showed me around the laboratory to introduce the machines
I applied online. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Thermo Fisher Scientific (Singapore) in Feb 2025
Interview
I applied on the website and was contacted by HR after a few days. I had to answer some questions regarding my knowledge via email first before interview date was confirmed. The interview was with direct QC team supervisor and project lead. There were no follow-ups once the interview ended.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How did you improve lead time? Have you heard of this software before?
I interviewed at Thermo Fisher Scientific (Eindhoven)
Interview
I found their recruitment process quite unusual due to several inconsistencies between the information provided by HR and that discussed during the technical interview. They are seeking someone to work full-time in the lab, but this requirement was neither clearly communicated during the HR interview nor outlined in the job description. Additionally, the lab environment may not be suitable for everyone, as it lacks windows. It would have been more transparent to disclose these details during the initial call rather than revealing them through questions in the technical interview. This approach gave the impression that they might be attempting to mislead candidates.