Pfizer Interview Questions

The interview process included a phone interview with the hiring manager (informal chat, 30'), an interview with another member in the team to provide feed back to the hiring manager and to understand about the position (30'), interview with HR (30'), panel interview (60'). Everything seems very short and go the points.

Very lenghty and difficult, I have never been in such a lenghty choosing process before for an intern role. They asked me questions for hypothetical scenarios that I couldn't have possily answered.

Applied online, got and email that my application is under consideration for the job position, scheduled a phone interview with HR through their AI scheduling system. After a day I was contacted to schedule an on-site interview with the hiring team.

phone call with recruiter, then hiring manager, then met with 3 other members of the team. quesitons were very high level and they didnt seem to really dig in on interpersonal skills or deeper questions

During my interview at Pfizer, I encountered a series of typical yet insightful questions that allowed me to showcase my skills and experiences. The interviewer explored my professional background, seeking to understand my previous accomplishments and contributions. Additionally, I was asked about my approach to problem-solving and how I handle challenges within a team setting. The questions were thoughtfully designed to assess not only my technical expertise but also my ability to adapt and collaborate. Overall, the interview provided a comprehensive view of Pfizer's emphasis on skills, teamwork, and problem-solving in their hiring process.

Series of online interviews with different managers/groups, In between interviews gave a 30 minute presentation followed by questions. Most individuals asked similar basic personality and technical questions. Lasted about 5 hours

Screener 15 min late for interview, very loud background, couldn’t hear interview questions, wouldn’t answer salary questions, waste of time. Interviewer had no technical knowledge, basically needed buzz words to pass on to the hiring manager.

Interview was straightforward and competency based. I was interviewed remotely by a mixed panel and again in person by a mixed panel. Both interviews seemed routine and the questions were not at all difficult. I felt they were interested in my responses.

not professional and no proper structure. Interview was casual and interviewer did not seem to be excited to hire as was only highlighting the bad parts of the role. came out of the interview feeling very dejected and not encouraged.

Received a hirevue which asked basic behavioral questions about the company. Questions were not too bad, study the star method. Took around 20-30 minutes and get a few tries for each questions. Did not receive next round interview.

Pretty good. The interviewer was very friendly and asked good questions. Not that hard to answer, as long as you studied before hand minimum materials. Overall, pretty good interview on most standards, could have went a little faster.